{"quotes":[{"text":"The construction of civilizational difference is not exclusive in any simple sense. The de-essentialization of Islam is paradigmatic for all thinking about the assimilation of non-European peoples to European civilization. The idea that people's historical experience is inessential to them, that it can be shed at will, makes it possible to argue more strongly for the Enlightenment's claim to universality: Muslims, as members of the abstract category 'humans,' can be assimilated or (as some recent theorist have put it) 'translated' into a global ('European') civilization once they have divested themselves of what many of them regard (mistakenly) as essential to themselves. The belief that human beings can be separated from their histories and traditions makes it possible to urge a Europeanization of the Islamic world. And by the same logic, it underlies the belief that the assimilation to Europe's civilization of Muslim immigrants who are--for good or for ill--already in European states is necessary and desirable.","author":"Talal Asad","tags":["christianity","eurabia","europe","european","islam","modernity-tags-civilization","multiculturalism","pluralism"],"id":5299,"author_id":"Talal+Asad"},{"text":"Evangelicals have squandered their cultural capital because they have tried to reclaim a standing in American culture that they never had. The American Founding was a mix of fragmented religious (and not-so-religious) voices.","author":"Joseph LaConte","tags":["arrogance","nostalgia","pluralism"],"id":25168,"author_id":"Joseph+LaConte"},{"text":"The construction of civilizational difference is not exclusive in any simple sense. The de-essentialization of Islam is paradigmatic for all thinking about the assimilation of non-European poeples to European civilization. The idea that people's historical experience is inessential to them, that it can be shed at will, makes it possible to argue more strongly for the Enlightenment's claim to universality: Muslims, as members of the abstract category 'humans,' can be assimilated or (as some recent theorist have put it) 'translated' into a global ('European') civilization once they have divested themselves of what many of them regard (mistakenly) as essential to themselves. The belief that human beings can be separated from their histories and traditions makes it possible to urge a Europeanization of the Islamic world. And by the same logic, it underlies the belief that the assimilation to Europe's civilization of Muslim immigrants who are--for good or for ill--already in European states is necessary and desirable.","author":"Talal Asad","tags":["eurabia","europe","european-civilization","islam","multiculturalism","pluralism"],"id":67226,"author_id":"Talal+Asad"},{"text":"Whatever we may think of the merits of torturing children for pleasure, and no doubt there is much to be said on both sides, I am sure we all agree that it should be done with sterilized instruments.","author":"G.K. Chesterton","tags":["irony","pluralism","politics","relativism"],"id":81721,"author_id":"G.K.+Chesterton"},{"text":"It is not a Buddhist approach to say that if everyone practiced Buddhism, the world would be a better place. Wars and oppression begin from this kind of thinking.","author":"Sulak Sivaraksa","tags":["buddhism","diversity","pluralism"],"id":119109,"author_id":"Sulak+Sivaraksa"},{"text":"The lights became stars, which became streaks in the grayspace, and then networks of fading shimmers.","author":"Ashim Shanker","tags":["ambiguity","ashim-shanker","divinity","doubt","ephemeral","evanescence","gray","human-existence","impermanence","light","metaphysical","multiplicity","network","ontology","pluralism","poetry","shimmer","singularity","space","streaks"],"id":135436,"author_id":"Ashim+Shanker"},{"text":"Light and Dark: each was unaware that the other existed.","author":"Ashim Shanker","tags":["ashim-shanker","chaos-and-order","cognition","contemplation","creation","dark","don-t-forget-to-breathe","dualities","enlightenment","entity","existence","faith-and-doubt","good-and-evil","illusion-of-self","light","metaphysics","migrations","morality","ontology","perception","philosophy","pluralism","poetry","shadow"],"id":184193,"author_id":"Ashim+Shanker"},{"text":"Yet while I do this work because of my faith, I also recognize of course that in a pluralistic society there are many different perspectives. It is both unrealistic and wrong to insist that everyone hold my views, my faith. The place we meet, in our differences, is in the founding documents of our democratic republic.","author":"Simone Campbell","tags":["faith","pluralism","society"],"id":205780,"author_id":"Simone+Campbell"},{"text":"But a society in which pluralism is not undergirded by some shared values and held together by some measure of mutual trust simply cannot survive. Pluralism that reflects no commitments whatever to the common good is pluralism gone berserk... ..Leaders unwilling to seek mutually workable arrangements within systems to their own are not surviving the long-term interest of their constituents.","author":"John W. Gardner","tags":["leadership","pluralism","society","values"],"id":212775,"author_id":"John+W.+Gardner"},{"text":"A love of neighbor manifests itself in the tolerance not only of opinions of others but, what is more important, of the essence and uniqueness of others, when we subscribe to that religious philosophy of life that insists that God has made each man and woman an individual sacred personality endowed with a specific temperament, created with differing needs, hungers, dreams. This is a variegated, pluralistic world where no two stars are the same and every snowflake has its own distinctive pattern. God apparently did not want a regimented world of sameness. That is why creation is so manifold. So it is with us human beings. Some are born dynamic and restless; others placid and contemplative…One man’s temperament is full throated with laughter; another’s tinkles with the sad chimes of gentle melancholy. Our physiques are different, and that simple difference oftentimes drives us into conflicting fulfillment of our natures, to action or to thought, to passion or to denial, to conquest or to submission. There is here no fatalism of endowment. We can change and prune and shape the hedges of our being, but we must rebel against the sharp shears being wielded by other hands, cutting off the living branches of our spirits in order to make our personalities adornments for their dwellings.","author":"Joshua Loth Liebman","tags":["acceptance","diversity","pluralism"],"id":217054,"author_id":"Joshua+Loth+Liebman"}],"pagination":{"page":1,"page_size":10,"total":22,"pages":3,"next":"?page=2\u0026page_size=10"}}