{"quotes":[{"text":"In this way the world market is, with regard to its immanent dynamic, 'a space in which everyone has once been a productive labourer, and in which labour has everywhere begun to price itself out of the system'.","author":"Slavoj Žižek","tags":["capitalism","markets","marx"],"id":7469,"author_id":"Slavoj+%C5%BDi%C5%BEek"},{"text":"Once you understand the economics of the Austrian School and the philosophy of liberty in the tradition of Rothbard, you never look at anything – not the state, the media, the central bank, the political class, nothing – the same way again.","author":"Llewellyn H. Rockwell Jr.","tags":["anarcho-capitalism","anarchy","ancap","austrian-school-of-economics","capitalism","coercion","economics","free","free-market","free-trade","freedom","government","libertarian","liberty","markets","non-aggression-principle","politics","statism","voluntaryism"],"id":24464,"author_id":"Llewellyn+H.+Rockwell+Jr."},{"text":"Only when the tide goes out do you discover who's been swimming naked.","author":"Warren Buffett","tags":["advice","economy","investing","markets","recession","wise-words"],"id":34633,"author_id":"Warren+Buffett"},{"text":"It's WW2 and there are wage controls in place. Instead of health care, companies decide to offer employees shoes. Having absorbed those costs, they later lobby for every company to be required to offer shoes. That calls forth regulation and monopolization of the shoe industry. Shoes are heavily subsidized. Every shoe must be approved. Producers must be domestic. They must adhere to a certain quality. They can't discriminate based on foot size or individual need. Prices rise, and some people lack shoes, so the Affordable Shoe Act forces everyone to buy into an official shoe plan or pay a fee. Here we have a perfect plan for making shoes egregiously expensive. The entire country would be consumed with the fear of being shoeless if they lose their job. The left wing calls for a single shoe provider to offer universal shoes and the right wing meekly suggests that shoe makers be permitted to sell across state lines.Meanwhile, libertarians suggest that we just forget the whole thing and let the market make and deliver shoes of every quality to anyone from anyone. Everyone screams that this is an insane and dangerous idea.","author":"Jeffrey Tucker","tags":["anarcho-capitalism","anarchy","coercion","collectivism","communism","economics","free","free-markets","freedom","government","interference","laissez-faire","law","libertarian","liberty","markets","monopoly","non-aggression-principle","politics","regulations","socialism","statism","trade","voluntaryism"],"id":36731,"author_id":"Jeffrey+Tucker"},{"text":"If we start to think about trust as a public good (like clean air and water), we see that we can all benefit from higher levels of trust in terms of communicating with others, making financial transitions smoother, simplifying contracts, and many other business and social activities. Without constant suspicion, we can get more out of our exchanges with others while spending less time making sure that others will fulfill their promises to us. Yet as the tragedy of commons exemplifies, in the short term it is beneficial for each individual to violate and take advantage of the established trust.I suspect that most people and companies miss or ignore the fact that trust is an important public resource and that losing it can have long-term negative consequences for everyone involved. It doesn't take much to violate trust. Just a few bad players in the market can spoil it for everyone else.","author":"Dan Ariely","tags":["markets","rationality","tragedy-of-commons","trust"],"id":41530,"author_id":"Dan+Ariely"},{"text":"Government as we now know it in the USA and other economically advanced countries is so manifestly horrifying, so corrupt, counterproductive, and outright vicious, that one might well wonder how it continues to enjoy so much popular legitimacy and to be perceived so widely as not only tolerable but indispensable. The answer, in overwhelming part, may be reduced to a two-part formula: bribes and bamboozlement (classically 'bread and circuses'). Under the former rubric falls the vast array of government 'benefits' and goodies of all sorts, from corporate subsidies and privileges to professional grants and contracts to welfare payments and health care for low-income people and other members of the lumpenproletariat. Under the latter rubric fall such measures as the government schools, the government's lapdog news media, and the government's collaboration with the producers of professional sporting events and Hollywood films. Seen as a semi-integrated whole, these measures give current governments a strong hold on the public's allegiance and instill in the masses and the elites alike a deep fear of anything that seriously threatens the status quo.","author":"Robert Higgs","tags":["anarchy","austrian-school-of-economics","belief","capitalism","coercion","collectivism","communi","democracy","empire","free","free-markets","freedom","irrational","laissez-faire","libertarian","liberty","markets","non-aggression-principle","peace","politics","prosperity","self-ownership","slavery","socialism","statism","subjugation","superstition","taxation","theft","totalitarianism","trade","useful-idiots","voluntaryism","voluntaryist"],"id":57284,"author_id":"Robert+Higgs"},{"text":"The problems on campus life today are not about free speech. They are about how the students have absolutely nothing to do with their lives but sit and listen to lectures, find the best parties to attend, and otherwise discover first-world problems to stew about and protest. That's the root of the problem. This is not a commercial environment where people are incentivized to find value in each other. Campuses have become completely artificial 4-year holding tanks for infantilized kids with zero experience in actual life in which people find ways to get along. These students are not serving each other in a market exchange, and very few have worked at day in their lives, so their default is to find some offense and protest. It's all they've been taught to do and all they know how to do. Idle hands and parents' money = trouble.","author":"Jeffrey Tucker","tags":["anarcho-capitalism","anarchy","ancap","economics","education","family","free","freedom","government","higher","idiocracy","laissez-faire","libertarian","liberty","markets","pupils","school","schooling","society","state","statism","students","trade","university","voluntaryism","youth"],"id":62956,"author_id":"Jeffrey+Tucker"},{"text":"... Toxic derivatives were underpinned by toxic economics, which, in turn, were no more than motivated delusions in search of theoretical justification; fundamentalist tracts that acknowledged facts only when they could be accommodated to the demands of the lucrative faith. Despite their highly impressive labels and technical appearance, economic models were merely mathematized versions of the touching superstition that markets know best, both at times of tranquility and in periods of tumult.","author":"Yanis Varoufakis","tags":["derivatives","economic-models","economics","markets"],"id":66631,"author_id":"Yanis+Varoufakis"},{"text":"Entrepreneurship is when an individual retrieves a red hot idea from the creativity furnace without the constraint of the heat of lean resources, and with each persistent blow of the innovation hammer shapes the still malleable idea against the anvil of passion, vision, insight, strategy, and principles to forge a fitting vessel of a creative concern.","author":"Amah Lambert","tags":["assets","business","creativity","entrepreneurship","growth","ideas","income","innovation","inspirational","investing","markets"],"id":72408,"author_id":"Amah+Lambert"},{"text":"Socialism is not really an option in the material world. There can be no collective ownership of anything materially scarce. One or another faction will assert control in the name of society. Inevitably, the faction will be the most powerful in society -- that is, the state. This is why all attempts to create socialism in scarce goods or services devolve into totalitarian systems of top-down planning.","author":"Jeffrey Tucker","tags":["anarcho-capitalism","anarchy","ancap","austrian-school-of-economics","itarian","capitalism","coercion","collective","collectivism","communism","economics","evil","free","free-market","freedom","government","individual","individualism","laissez-faire","libertarian","liberty","markets","non-aggression-principle","politics","regulations","socialism","statism","trade","voluntaryism","voluntaryist"],"id":90934,"author_id":"Jeffrey+Tucker"}],"pagination":{"page":1,"page_size":10,"total":54,"pages":6,"next":"?page=2\u0026page_size=10"}}