{"quotes":[{"text":"Can social progress be made without government?It's like saying 'can happiness be achieved without the initiation of violence? Can romance be achieved without rape? Can profitability be achieved without theft? Can economic growth be achieved without the mass indebted enslavement and counterfeiting of the federal reserve?'.","author":"Stefan Molyneux","tags":["anarchy","austrian-school-of-economics","freedom","laissez-faire","libertarian","liberty","philosophy","voluntaryism"],"id":1641,"author_id":"Stefan+Molyneux"},{"text":"There can be no socialism without a state, and as long as there is a state there is socialism. The state, then, is the very institution that puts socialism into action; and as socialism rests on aggressive violence directed against innocent victims, aggressive violence is the nature of any state.","author":"Hans-Hermann Hoppe","tags":["aggression","anarcho-capitalism","anarchy","ancap","austrian-school-of-economics","coercion","collectivism","communism","evil","free-markets","free-trade","freedom","government","individualism","initiation-of-force","laissez-faire","libertarian","liberty","nap","non-aggression-principle","politics","self-ownership","statism","voluntaryism","voluntaryist"],"id":14755,"author_id":"Hans-Hermann+Hoppe"},{"text":"Dear Anarcho-Communist,If you and I ever find ourselves in a stateless society, have no fear. Just mention that you are a communist, and I promise I will never try to 'oppress' and 'exploit' you by offering to trade with you, or by offering to pay you to do work.Sincerely,Larken Rose.","author":"Larken Rose","tags":["anarcho-capitalism","anarchy","ancap","ancom","coercion","collectivism","communism","freedom","laissez-faire","libertarian","libertopia","liberty","non-aggression-principle","socialism","society","statism","superstition","voluntaryism"],"id":15926,"author_id":"Larken+Rose"},{"text":"The movement that I’m in favor of is a movement of libertarians who do not substitute whim for reason. Now some of them do, obviously, and I’m against that. I’m in favor of reason over whim. As far as I’m concerned, and I think the rest of the movement, too, we are anarcho-capitalists. In other words, we believe that capitalism is the fullest expression of anarchism, and anarchism is the fullest expression of capitalism. Not only are they compatible, but you can’t really have one without the other. True anarchism will be capitalism, and true capitalism will be anarchism.","author":"Murray N. Rothbard","tags":["anarcho-capitalism","anarchy","ancap","austrian-school-of-economics","cooperation","free","free-market","freedom","laissez-faire","libertarian","liberty","nap","non-aggression-principle","peace","trade","voluntaryism"],"id":23258,"author_id":"Murray+N.+Rothbard"},{"text":"Private property and free trade stand on exactly the same footing, both being essential and indivisible parts of liberty, both depending upon rights, which no body of men, whether called governments or anything else, can justly take from the individual.","author":"Auberon Herbert","tags":["coercion","evil","free-market","freedom","government","individualism","laissez-faire","libertarian","liberty","non-aggression-principle","politics","statism","taxation","theft","violence","voluntaryism"],"id":30181,"author_id":"Auberon+Herbert"},{"text":"It's WW2 and there are wage controls in place. Instead of health care, companies decide to offer employees shoes. Having absorbed those costs, they later lobby for every company to be required to offer shoes. That calls forth regulation and monopolization of the shoe industry. Shoes are heavily subsidized. Every shoe must be approved. Producers must be domestic. They must adhere to a certain quality. They can't discriminate based on foot size or individual need. Prices rise, and some people lack shoes, so the Affordable Shoe Act forces everyone to buy into an official shoe plan or pay a fee. Here we have a perfect plan for making shoes egregiously expensive. The entire country would be consumed with the fear of being shoeless if they lose their job. The left wing calls for a single shoe provider to offer universal shoes and the right wing meekly suggests that shoe makers be permitted to sell across state lines.Meanwhile, libertarians suggest that we just forget the whole thing and let the market make and deliver shoes of every quality to anyone from anyone. Everyone screams that this is an insane and dangerous idea.","author":"Jeffrey Tucker","tags":["anarcho-capitalism","anarchy","coercion","collectivism","communism","economics","free","free-markets","freedom","government","interference","laissez-faire","law","libertarian","liberty","markets","monopoly","non-aggression-principle","politics","regulations","socialism","statism","trade","voluntaryism"],"id":36731,"author_id":"Jeffrey+Tucker"},{"text":"The way to a landowner's heart was to tax gently.","author":"Peter Heather","tags":["government","laissez-faire","politics"],"id":37261,"author_id":"Peter+Heather"},{"text":"Private property is redundant. 'Public property' is an oxymoron. All legit property is private. If property isn't private it's stolen.","author":"Gustave de Molinari","tags":["freedom","government","laissez-faire","libertarian","liberty","statism","voluntaryism"],"id":37787,"author_id":"Gustave+de+Molinari"},{"text":"Our politicians tell us we are free, even though most governments take over 50% of what we earn. They claim we get services that we need for our hard-earned money, even though we could buy the same services at half the price from the private sector. Today, we ridicule the slave-owners' claim that they 'gave back' to their slaves by housing, clothing, feeding them, and bestowing upon them the 'benefits' of civilization instead of leaving them in their native state. We see this as a self-serving justification for exploitation. In the future, we will view being forcibly taxed to pay for things we don't want, such as bombs for the Middle East, subsidies for tobacco, other people's abortions, regulations that put small businesses out of business, prisons for people trying to feel good, keeping life-saving medications out of the hands of dying people, etc., as taking away our freedom. When even a small portion of our lives is spent enslaved, that part tends to dominate the rest of our time. If we don't put our servitude first as we structure the remainder of our lives, our masters will make sure we regret it. How much freedom do we need to survive and how much do we need to thrive?","author":"Mary J. Ruwart","tags":["coercion","freedom","laissez-faire","libertarian","liberty","non-aggression-principle","politics","socialism","statism","taxation","taxes","theft","voluntaryism"],"id":42724,"author_id":"Mary+J.+Ruwart"},{"text":"Conflict is not unavoidable. However, it is nonsensical to consider the institution of a state as a solution to the problem of possible conflict, because it is precisely the institution of a state which first makes conflict unavoidable and permanent.","author":"Hans-Hermann Hoppe","tags":["anarcho-capitalism","anarchy","ancap","austrian-school-of-economics","capitalism","coercion","democracy","evil","freedom","government","laissez-faire","libertarian","liberty","non-aggression-principle","politics","statism","taxation","theft","thugs","violence","voluntaryism"],"id":46992,"author_id":"Hans-Hermann+Hoppe"}],"pagination":{"page":1,"page_size":10,"total":124,"pages":13,"next":"?page=2\u0026page_size=10"}}