{"quotes":[{"text":"These days when Christians bicker they exaggerate passion into a legalistic belief and prosperity into a lukewarm belief.","author":"Criss Jami","tags":["apologetics","arguing","argumentation","belief","bickering","christian","christianity","conflict","criticism","debating","denominations","disagreement","exaggeration","gospel","hypocrisy","judgment","legalism","lukewarm","opposition","passion","prosperity","religion","spirituality"],"id":19153,"author_id":"Criss+Jami"},{"text":"In learning and argumentation, the quality brain is similar to a facility of maximum security. What passes the logic test, free of fallacy and pretense, then must pass the test of biblical accuracy in order to proceed as an adopted, reliable truth.","author":"Criss Jami","tags":["argumentation","belief","bible","blind-faith","development","evidence","fact","faith","fallacies","growth","knowledge","learning","lies","logical-fallacies","mentality","reasonable","religion","skepticism","theology","truth"],"id":33933,"author_id":"Criss+Jami"},{"text":"The study of Scripture I find to be quite like mastering an instrument. No one is so good that they cannot get any better; no one knows so much that they can know no more. A professional can spot an amateur or a lack of practice or experience a mile away. His technicality, his spiritual ear is razor-sharp. He is familiar with the common mistakes, the counter-arguments; and insofar as this, he can clearly distinguish the difference between honest critics of the Faith and mere fools who criticize that which they know nothing.","author":"Criss Jami","tags":["agnosticism","amateur","antitheistic","apologetics","application","argumentation","atheism","bible","counter-argument","criticism","deceit","development","dialect","discernment","fallacies","false-preaching","false-prophet","false-teaching","falsehood","figurative","foolish","immaturity","improvement","instrument","judgment","knowledge","language","learning","lies","lingo","logic","logical-fallacies","mastering","mastering-oneself","mastering-the-mind","maturity","metaphor","mind","music","philosophy","practice","preacher","professional","prophet","religion","scripture","simile","studying","teacher","theism","theology","truth","wisdom"],"id":45066,"author_id":"Criss+Jami"},{"text":"It is never ridicule, but a compliment, that knocks a philosopher off his feet. He is already positioned for every possible counter-attack, counter-argument, and retort...Only to find a big bear hug coming his way.","author":"Criss Jami","tags":["anticipation","apologetics","apologists","argumentation","arguments","attack","bear","compliment","counter","counter-argument","defense","evangelism","evangelism-apologetics","evangelists","hugs","philosophers","philosophy","retort","ridicule","theologians","theology"],"id":91694,"author_id":"Criss+Jami"},{"text":"Heresy would like to think of itself as 'invented Truth'. But of course, all Reason and Logic would agree that no man can ever create Truth; he can only discover it. If heresy were ever at all beneficial, God would use it really to bring one right back to Truth, as countless 'inventions' have brought men to discovery.","author":"Criss Jami","tags":["answers","apologetics","argumentation","beliefs","church","create","deceit","definition","discovery","doctrine","exploration","facts","false-prophets","falsehood","fundamental","gnosticism","god","heresy","honesty","hope","invent","lies","logic","mathematics","mystery","opinions","original","orthodoxy","philosophy","questions","reason","religion","science","theology","thinking","thought","truth","unoriginal"],"id":121702,"author_id":"Criss+Jami"},{"text":"Cursed luck! —said he, biting his lip as he shut the door, —for man to be master of one of the finest chains of reasoning in nature, —and have a wife at the same time with such a head-piece, that he cannot hang up a single inference within side of it, to save his soul from destruction.","author":"Laurence Sterne","tags":["argumentation","logic","misogyny","women"],"id":142244,"author_id":"Laurence+Sterne"},{"text":"I had become too accustomed to the pseudo-Left new style, whereby if your opponent thought he had identified your lowest possible motive, he was quite certain that he had isolated the only real one. This vulgar method, which is now the norm and the standard in much non-Left journalism as well, is designed to have the effect of making any noisy moron into a master analyst.","author":"Christopher Hitchens","tags":["ad-hominem","argumentation","fallacy","journalism","leftism"],"id":153308,"author_id":"Christopher+Hitchens"},{"text":"1. God is (by definition) a being than which no greater being can be thought.2. Greatness includes greatness of virtue.3. Therefore, God is a being than which no being could be more virtuous.4. But virtue involves overcoming pains and dangers.5. Indeed, a being can only be properly said to be virtuous if it can suffer pain or be destroyed.6. A God that can suffer pain or is destructible is not one than which no greater being can be thought.7.For you can think of a greater being, that is, one that is nonsuffering and indestructible.8. Therefore, God does not exist.","author":"Douglas N. Walton","tags":["argument","argumentation","atheism-argument","formal-logic","logic","reasoning","sound","valid"],"id":221326,"author_id":"Douglas+N.+Walton"},{"text":"Logic, it is often said, is the study of valid arguments. It is a systematic attempt to distinguish valid arguments from invalid arguments.","author":"W.H. Newton-Smith","tags":["argumentation","arguments","definition","logic","math","mathematics","philosopher-of-science","philosophy","philosophy-of-logic","study","valid-arguments","validity"],"id":241739,"author_id":"W.H.+Newton-Smith"},{"text":"When your view is criticized or even ridiculed on television, on radio talk show, or in a newspaper editorial, don't just react angrily. Take a moment to jot down on paper the person's main thesis and how that thesis was supported. Then do two things. First, assume the person is expressing at least some good points and try to identify them. This assumption may be false, but the search for common ground with intellectual opponents is a good habit. In the process of identifying these good points, try to argue against your own view. Second, try to state on paper exactly how you would argue against the view being expressed in an intellectually precise yet emotionally calm way.","author":"J.P. Moreland","tags":["argumentation","empathy","flame-wars","understanding"],"id":291608,"author_id":"J.P.+Moreland"}],"pagination":{"page":1,"page_size":10,"total":16,"pages":2,"next":"?page=2\u0026page_size=10"}}